Archive for the ‘Parks’ Category

Another Grab for Park Land About to Happen on Milwaukee’s Lakefront?

March 2nd, 2010

It’s come to my attention that there are plans circulating which would eliminate part of Veterans Memorial Park on Milwaukee’s lakefront in order to build a parking lot.

As unbelievable as it may seem I’ve been informed it’s being proposed and have a copy of a document being circulated that shows how the War Memorial wants to take over several acres of park land in Veterans Memorial Park and turn it into a parking lot.

For those who are wondering, there is currently a huge parking lot in the O’Donnell Park parking structure which is located about 200 feet from the War Memorial, so your guess is as good as mine as to why the War Memorial feels it needs to go out and decrease the amount of park land in order to provide parking spaces a whopping 50 feet closer.

Below are some overviews of the land in question, including an overlay of where the proposed parking lot would go.

screen-capture

I’ll have more information as I get it, but Milwaukee County elected officials and County Supervisors especially should be wary about considering this proposal if it gets to the point where they need to weigh in on it.

Walker Cuts Bone But Leaves the Fat with 76 Layoffs; Repercussions in Parks Will be Seen Quickly

February 27th, 2010

Yesterday 76 more people in Milwaukee County had to sit down at the kitchen table and tell their family something I can’t even begin to imagine: they’d been fired.

The Journal Sentinel has the breakdown, including a quote from the administration (though not the CE himself, he was apparently at a campaign rally in Racine yesterday when the news hit):

Those being laid off are 27 security guards at five major county buildings, 25 parks maintenance workers, nine Mitchell International Airport employees, five highway maintenance workers and 10 other Department of Transportation and Public Works staffers. They were given two weeks’ notice. – jsonline.com

My best goes out to all of them. I know a few who were maintenance workers for the parks and loved doing their jobs.

After this round of layoffs there will be no more “Parks Maintenance Worker I” positions anymore. There used to be 45 or so of these positions just a few years ago. Heading into spring, the impact on our parks will be immediate and noticeable. These are the people who, among other things, empty garbage cans, plow snow, fix swing sets and make sure parks are safe for families to enjoy.

There are now by my estimates fewer than 60 people now available to take care of the 15,000 acres of park land in 144 parks in our County. If you were planning on having a wedding reception at some place like South Shore Pavilion like Jenny and I did, you may literally be responsible for making sure the bathrooms have toilet paper for your guests and the trash has been emptied the day before. There just won’t be anyone left to do it anymore.

The move will save a less than impressive $1.8 million this year, and I’m left to wonder why those being asked to make the sacrifices and tighten their belts continue to be the blue collar workers who are more often than not the primary bread winners for their families?

If the administration in the County were serious about tackling the $10 million budget hole, why are they only going after blue collar workers? As I’ve pointed out several times, why does the County Executive have both a “Receptionist” and an “Executive secretary for scheduling“? Why both a “Director of Communications” and a “Deputy Director of Communications“? What is really the difference between the two positions (and handsome salaries that match) in the County Executive’s office for “Director of Community Relations” and “Constituent Services“?

If you’re going to get serious about fixing the budget deficit, why not start with your own office first? Surely, consolidating or eliminating some of those positions would put a dent in the $10 million deficit just as well as firing the people who keep the parks clean, right?

If you’re going to get serious about fixing the budget deficit, why not start with the boondoggle of a payroll system known as “Ceridian” that’s cost taxpayers over $20 million to develop and after five years still isn’t close to working? How about getting rid of the programs like Ceridian which are wasteful instead of the people who take out the waste?

I could go on, and a lot of people who know more than me about County Government could as well.

To those of you who had to have that gut wrenching conversation about “what do we do now?” with your wife or husband or children last night, my thoughts are with you.

Colorado Springs a Case Study in Service Cuts, Milwaukee Should Pay Attention

February 2nd, 2010

Read about what’s happening in Colorado Springs Colorado these days if you want a sneak peak into what Milwaukee County would look like if the “kill off government” crowd gets their way. If your tax rate isn’t the first thing you consider when choosing where to live (and most people aren’t) and you actually value a high quality of life where you live, it’s frightening.

No pools, no parks, no street lights, slashed safety budgets, increased response times.. it goes on and on. But at least they didn’t have to raise taxes!!

This tax-averse city is about to learn what it looks and feels like when budget cuts slash services most Americans consider part of the urban fabric.

More than a third of the streetlights in Colorado Springs will go dark Monday. The police helicopters are for sale on the Internet. The city is dumping firefighting jobs, a vice team, burglary investigators, beat cops — dozens of police and fire positions will go unfilled.

The parks department removed trash cans last week, replacing them with signs urging users to pack out their own litter.

Neighbors are encouraged to bring their own lawn mowers to local green spaces, because parks workers will mow them only once every two weeks. If that.

Water cutbacks mean most parks will be dead, brown turf by July; the flower and fertilizer budget is zero.

City recreation centers, indoor and outdoor pools, and a handful of museums will close for good March 31 unless they find private funding to stay open. Buses no longer run on evenings and weekends. The city won’t pay for any street paving, relying instead on a regional authority that can meet only about 10 percent of the need.

It should serve as a warning to everyone across the Country that the extreme position of “shut down government” doesn’t work. The scary thing for me is that if a few powerful people in Milwaukee had their way, this is what our home town would look like too.

Public Policy Forum Report on Milwaukee County: Cut Legacy Costs & Streamline Government

January 27th, 2010

The Public Policy Forum released it’s long anticipated report on about the future of County Government in Milwaukee today, and as intended, it should get people talking about the future of Milwaukee County Government.

The report is titled “Should it Stay or Should it Go? Exploring the potential for structural reform in Milwaukee County government.” and like previous reports authored by the non-partisan Public Policy Forum, it’s a comprehensive, intelligent and thought provoking report that lays out many of the problems our County faces while also offering some recommendations to politicians and other civic leaders.

The synopsis for the report, which you can download for yourself on their site, follows:

Should It Stay or Should It Go?
Exploring the potential for structural reform in
Milwaukee County government

January 2010

Milwaukee County government faces immediate and substantial fiscal and programmatic challenges. The county’s structural deficit is defined as the gap between expenditure needs and anticipated revenues & is projected to grow from $48 million in 2011 to more than $106 million by 2014, despite several successive years of significant expenditure and staff reductions and anticipation of significant wage and benefit concessions in 2010. This projection is the clearest indication yet that the county’s finances are crumbling and that valued services in areas like parks, transit, mental health and public safety face severe degradation without prompt and concerted action. This action could take any of several forms, including the complete elimination of Milwaukee County government. This report, commissioned by the Greater Milwaukee Committee, provides detailed analysis and perspective on the complex issues surrounding that option, as well as other potential structural changes.

It’s by no means a quick read. Instead, it’s a very in depth look at the reasons we have a structural deficit and possible solutions for digging ourselves out. I haven’t yet had a chance to read the whole thing myself as yet, but I did take some time early this morning to read the roughly 10 pages dedicated to Parks funding and governance structures. (If you want to follow along, the part about parks starts roughly on page 86)

In short, the recommendations about a dedicated funding source for the parks will sound familiar to anyone who reads my blog, but hopefully the idea of something like an independent parks district will find some new supporters in the environmental and business community because of this report.

In a nutshell, this is exactly what many park supporters have known and been raising awareness about for years, and it’s great that the PPF has come to many of the same conclusions as we have because it will increase the credibility and hopefully the acceptance of some of the recommendations.

While well researched and written reports like this can help to move the ball forward in addressing the long term issues facing Milwaukee County, it’s important to face the reality that there are also a lot of people who are heavily invested – for a variety of reasons – in having nothing change at all.

The Public Policy Forum, and it’s President Rob Henken, once again deserve credit for producing the kind of in-depth analysis that helps to break down very complex issues into a something the public can understand and develop a greater understanding of. It’s data like this that helps to make our Government more efficient and accountable to it’s citizens and they deserve a very big “thank you” for doing so. Also, the Greater Milwaukee Committee, and it’s President Julia Taylor, deserve acknowledgment for providing the financial resources needed to produce a report as thorough and exhaustive as this one.

0.5% Sales Tax for Milwaukee County Parks Passes Assembly Committee

January 13th, 2010

Good news for those in favor of getting a dedicated funding source for the Milwaukee County Parks in place!

Assembly Bill 504 passed the Ways and Means committee late yesterday by a vote of 6-4.

I’ve mentioned AB504 several times in the past. It would institute a 0.5% sales tax within Milwaukee County to pay for parks, culture and recreation programs which are now paid for through a County property tax levy.

The bill would require that the majority of the money raised through the sales tax be used to lower property taxes, and a 0.5% sales tax would provide around $55-$60 million per year in funding for parks, recreation and culture.

Obviously, there’s a lot of work yet to be done as it will now require a full vote in the Assembly before moving on to the Senate and getting the Governor’s approval, but it’s encouraging to see something you’ve worked for literally a year on finally start moving through the process.

Kudos to the six legislators who voted to move this bill out of committee, and thanks to all of you who called in the past week to voice your support!

Momentum Building for Secure & Dedicated Funding Source for Milwaukee County Parks

January 11th, 2010

The Saturday edition of the Journal Sentinel reported on the Milwaukee County Parks Department long range plan which also specifies two potential sources as a dedicated funding source in order to stop the long downward spiral the parks have been in.

The survival of Milwaukee County’s extensive parks system calls for adoption of its own sales tax or a dedicated property tax, according to a long-range plan by the county parks department.

The 2035 county “Park and Open Space Plan” also forecasts millions of dollars in new park development over the next quarter-century and warns of a hefty existing maintenance backlog.

The parks tax idea is cast in the report as something that “most likely” will be required to ensure the parks thrive over the long term. The sales tax idea has been hotly debated, with voters agreeing in a 2008 advisory referendum to a half-cent increase in the local sales tax for parks, recreation and culture.

The report’s alternate suggestion of a dedicated property tax says that would likely entail the creation of a separate park district.

The report was prepared by the county’s Parks, Recreation and Culture Department as a long-range blueprint and would replace the last such plan done a decade ago. The long-range plans are required for state park grant programs. – jsonline.com

It’s no longer a question of “if” our Milwaukee County Parks need help and a secure dedicated funding source. The public has voiced their support for parks, and report after report is concurring (including yet another from a prominent group that will be released in the next several weeks) that the path forward is either a dedicated sales tax or some version of a parks district.

Right now Assembly bill 504 is working it’s way through the legislature. State Representatives Christine Sinicki and Jon Richards who are both from Milwaukee have introduced AB504 in the State Assembly that would enable the County to impose a half percent sales tax for Parks and Culture in Milwaukee County. In November 2008, a majority of Milwaukee County residents approved an advisory referendum to shift parks, recreation and culture from the property tax to a dedicated sales tax.
If you care about the long term viability of our parks, please take two minutes to contact one of the following members of the Assembly Ways & Means committee to voice your support:

Here is contact information for committee members:

Representative Gary Hebl (Chair)
Room 120 North
State Capitol
Box 8952
Madison, WI 53708
(608) 266-7678
Rep.Hebl@legis.wisconsin.gov
Representative Barbara Toles
Room 124 North
State Capitol
Box 8953
Madison, WI 53708
(608) 266-5580
Rep.Toles@legis.wisconsin.gov
Representative. John Steinbrink
Room 104 North
State Capitol
Box 8953
Madison, WI 53708
(608) 266-0455
Rep.Steinbrink@legis.wisconsin.gov
Representative Jon Richards
Room 118 North
State Capitol
Box 8953
Madison, WI 53708
(608) 266-0650
Rep.Richards@legis.wisconsin.gov
Representative Josh Zepnick
Room 219 North
State Capitol
Box 8953
Madison, WI 53708
(608) 266-1707
Rep.Zepnick@legis.wisconsin.gov
Representative Jeffrey Wood
Room 21 North
State Capitol
Box 8953
Madison, WI 53708
(608) 266-1194
Rep.WoodJ@legis.wisconsin.gov
Representative Samantha Kerkman
Room 103 West
State Capitol
Box 8952
Madison, WI 53708
(608) 266-2530
Rep.Kerkman@legis.wisconsin.gov
Representative Stephen Nass
Room 12 West
State Capitol
Box 8953
Madison, WI 53708
(608) 266-5715
Rep.Nass@legis.wisconsin.gov
Representative Daniel Knodl
Room 4 West
State Capitol
Box 8952
Madison, WI 53708
(608) 266-3796
Rep.Knodl@legis.wisconsin.gov

(Another disclaimer: I, along with several other park supporters, had a hand in crafting Assembly bill 504.)

Journal Sentinel & Others Wrong about Solutions to Address Problems in Milwaukee County Audit of Park System

January 5th, 2010

The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel has an article in today’s paper about the audit report of the Milwaukee County Parks system which I wrote about yesterday.

For the most part, the article simply restates what the audit report says with a few quotes sprinkled in for good measure.

The one thing I was disappointed about is the headline for the article, “Sales of county parkland suggested”.

The sale of parkland is one of many recommendations made in the audit, so why did the JS choose to imply with a headline like that a sale was the only suggestion made?

Frankly, it’s sloppy and poor reporting more interested in generating “buzz” than actually reporting the findings of the audit report. Unfortunately, it’s what the public will consume and another glaring example of the sorry state of Wisconsin’s largest daily newspaper.

For the record, here are all the recommendations in the order they were made in the audit:

  1. Establish criteria for determining whether a facility should be fixed or demolished.
  2. Replace some current facilities with alternative structures that have lower construction and/or maintenance costs.
  3. Expand opportunities for the types of public/private partnerships that have successfully leveraged private capital in the maintenance and improvement of several Parks locations.
  4. Undertake a comprehensive assessment of current and future Parks developments, taking into consideration alternatives to reduce overall infrastructure costs. Another alternative that could be considered in this assessment is the potential for divestiture of some County parkland. Divestiture could take the form of sale for development, or transfer to a municipality or non-profit entity for continuation or development of recreational use. Various restrictions associated with the original acquisition of parkland (e.g., federal funding requirements, deed restrictions on donated land, etc.) could prohibit or severely restrict divestiture options for many Park system holdings.

Why the reporter or editor from the Journal Sentinel went down the path of selecting the fourth recommendation as the headline and focus for the story is telling and unfortunate.

As for the issue of selling park land itself, I’d argue that it would do nothing to address the long term problems the parks are facing nor would it address the massive amount of deferred maintenance. If you simply sell off a portion of parkland without addressing the root issue, in five or ten years you’ll simply be in the same situation because you’ve failed to maintain the parks that you didn’t sell off the first time.

The “solution” of selling park land in Milwaukee County to address the $200 – $300 million in deferred maintenance would be about as logical as amputating your foot because you need hip replacement surgery. It does nothing – zero – to address to real issue which is an unstable and unsustainable funding source for the Milwaukee County Parks. That is the problem which has led to deferred maintenance and until we get serious and deal with the funding for our parks, all the posturing in the world about how to alleviate the symptoms won’t make a bit of difference.

The real solution is a dedicated and secure funding source for the Milwaukee County Parks just like the one voters approved last November. It’s only with a secure and dedicated funding source that we can even begin to address the massive amount of deferred maintenance that needs to be done and reverse the downward spiral of one of Milwaukee’s greatest treasures: it’s 15,000 acres of public park land.

New Audit Shows “Jewels” and “Eyesores” as Milwaukee County Falls Behind in Park Maintenance

January 4th, 2010

A lot of numbers are casually thrown around when talking about the Milwaukee County Parks system. $300 million in deferred maintenance. $47 million budget. 50% property tax support.

The Milwaukee County Department of Audit today released it’s audit of the Park system it’s been working on for nearly nine months in an attempt to clear up some of those numbers and provide a “State of the Parks” type of document.

The title of the audit, “A tale of two systems: Three decades of declining resources leave Milwaukee County Parks Reflecting the Best and Worst of Times” is a literary twist on the classic Dickens novel, but the report itself is anything but a “good read” if you use or support any of the Milwaukee County Parks.

It’s a long document which you can read here for yourself, but a single sentence from the executive summary sums it up rather well in my opinion:

Three Decades of Declining Resources Have Led to the Parks System’s Current State of Select Showcase Holdings, but Unsustainable Infrastructure Demands

The report highlights both the good and the bad in Milwaukee County Parks right now, and it’s worth pointing out that the highlighted “jewels” in the report all have strong “friends groups” or are actually run by a non-profit friends group.

The eyesore section of the report shows in graphic detail what many of us who are in the parks on a regular basis have come to understand: when you get up close, there are staggering issues that need to be addressed by the land that we the public own. Check out some of the pictures from Hoyt Park for example. We wouldn’t let our own houses or property get to this kind of sad state, so why do we let it happen to the property we own as a community?

I’ll hold off on further commentary on the audit report for now, but I did want to make the point that it is out here, and if you have 5 or 10 minutes, it’s a read that offers a revealing look into the state of the Milwaukee County Park system.

(Small disclaimer: I’m the President of the Board of Directors of The Park People. We are referenced several times in the report and did provide data and respond to interviews to the audit group.)

New Column at MilwaukeeMoms.com – Combat the Winter Break Blues in Your County Parks

December 15th, 2009

My latest column for milwaukeemoms.com is now available: Combat the “Winter Break Blues” in your Milwaukee County Parks

Sometimes over winter break, it can be hard for parents to find fun activities for their kids. I the latest column, I point out some of the options for fun winter activities the whole family can enjoy in one of your many Milwaukee County Parks. Take a read if you get a chance and keep the winter break blues at bay!

The Good and Bad News from Milwaukee County Board Veto Meeting

November 18th, 2009

While (as of 10pm) the Journal Sentinel still doesn’t have anything up about what happened at the County Courthouse today regarding the County Board dealing with the County Executive’s vetoes, I do have some thoughts and news about what happened today.

At the end of the day, some critical programs and services were completely cut, some were saved and the property tax levy for Milwaukee County will rise 2.18% next year, which is lower than the rate of increase of many other Counties in SE Wisconsin.

So what did the County Board override and keep funding for?

  • Security services at the Courthouse.
  • Alcohol treatment and drug addiction (AODA).
  • Add indoor aquatic centers at the Noyes and Pulaski pools
  • Nearly 40 park maintenance workers
  • The  Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Kosciuszko community centers
  • The Community Justice Resource Center

Services or programs that didn’t survive:

  • Sports authority funding, which provides recreational opportunities for underserved youth.
  • The call center for those needing help to get help for the Milwaukee County Transit System.
  • Housekeeping services will be outsourced at the Dept. of Health and Human Services as well as the Behavioral Health division.
  • Funding for an office of sustainability.

Also of note is that the “plan” to put parking meters on Milwaukee’s lakefront went down in flames. Only four Supervisors voted for parking meters along Lincoln Memorial Drive at Bradford Beach. Supervisors Borkowski, Sanfelipo, Cesarz, and Lynne DeBruin (my County Supervisor) all were in favor the the $1/hour parking meters along the Lakefront.

While there were some definite victories today, the fact is that in several key areas, the County Board fell short of overriding the County Executive’s vetoes by a single vote on several occasions. At the end of the day, the average property tax bill for a Milwaukee County homeowner will rise in 2010 by around $3.00. That’s three dollars for the entire year.

On another note, the mood in the Courthouse was very tense today. Some Supervisors are clearly not dealing with the pressure of special interest groups like CRG well and instead of showing some courage and standing strong to bullying, they instead chose to bow to the demands of a very small, but very vocal group.

One thing that’s very clear? This entire process is going to play itself out again next year as the CE will be in the final days of an election for Governor (if he makes it through the primary) and if we continue to ignore the fact that the funding structure for Gov. services in this State and County are fundamentally broken.

In Brief: Parks Sales Tax, Tea Party Storm Brewing, Milwaukee Bucks Expectations

November 13th, 2009

Happy Friday! Fall has apparently returned to Milwaukee, just in time for Thanksgiving. In case you have been able to dodge the onslaught of “Holiday” advertising, you have 40 shopping days left before Christmas. On this day 53 years ago, the Supreme Court declared Alabama and Montgomery, Alabama laws requiring segregated buses illegal. It’s amazing to me that only 50 years ago, people were sorted by color on public buses.

  • Yesterday in Madison there was a hearing on Assembly Bill 504 which would provide a 0.5% sales tax to fund parks, culture and recreation in Milwaukee County. This is the other half of the referendum that passed last year in Milwaukee that would have taken parks and transit off the property tax levy and shifted them to a sales tax. There were 24 people who spoke to the Assembly committee yesterday, all in favor. Another 12 registered in support of the half percent. This is something park supporters and I personally have been working hard to move through the legislative process, and our testimony was received very positively yesterday. Hopefully the bill can come up for a vote in the next several months.
  • Not that I’m surprised, but apparently there is some tension brewing within the “tea party” movement including a lawsuit by one tea party group against the leader of another. Who could have imagined that a bunch people who’s rallying cry is being “against” everything have trouble getting behind something? Running non-profits is hard work and if there are people writing checks taken on behalf of the organization back to themselves – with no documentation – that is going to be a bigger problem than the sniping between the two groups.
  • I’m not the biggest of basketball fans, but I do cheer for the hometown team and catch a Bucks game once in a while. But I think this whole “Brandon Jennings is an All-Star and the Bucks are going to be great” meme going around right now, and propagated on a daily basis by the Journal Sentinel, is just ridiculous and setting everyone up for a massive disappointment when Jennings doesn’t turn out to be the next Michael Jordon and the Bucks don’t win their first NBA title since color TV’s became the norm. Brandon Jennings does have talent, there’s no question. He’s also a 20 year old rookie on a team of under achieving players. I’m all for the Bucks doing well, but this “Why isn’t he on the All-Star ballot” talk needs to go. Anyone else remember two seasons ago when the Brewers started out hot and the media outlets held a contest (in May!) to give a nickname to the team because they were on the way to the World Series? That worked out really well. So cheer for the Bucks and leave the All-Star/NBA championship talk at home.