Apr 28 2006

Gas Prices Get Political

Published by Daniel Cody at 11:35 am under Politics

I’ve been holding off on posting anything about the flurry of activity around the rising gas prices stories this week. I think that all the rhetoric around it is ridiculous, especially since this issue has been coming at us for months and very few people have said anything about it until gas prices hit $3.00 a gallon.

Slight tangent. Dear Media Outlets: I really don’t care that a gallon of Starbucks would cost $11.93, or that a gallon of imported bottled water is $23.00 per gallon. Firstly, I don’t buy 10 gallons of coffee or bottled water from Fiji at a time, nor are they required for me to get to work. Secondly, it just shows how far out of touch you are with mainstream American’s who would probably laugh at you for paying $3.00 for a cup of coffee or bottle of imported fancy pants water to begin with. Trying to compare luxury items to a necessity like gasoline and then joking how lucky we are that we’re stuck with paying $3.00 a gallon for it just smacks of the elitism that so many accuse you of.

One other thing. Two weeks into this huge gas price increase, we’ve got the idea that drivers are ‘fed up’ with high prices and don’t need you doing live reports from gas stations on the 6pm news ad nausuem. We know gas prices are high, and we know we’re getting screwed. How about reporting on the ‘WHY’ we’re getting screwed instead of the ‘HOW’ we’re getting screwed on a daily basis. I realize that it’s a segment that requires little work or thought on your part to produce, but please stop.

Anyways. I think it’s amusing that the same people who control the Federal government that just gave the oil companies over $15 billion in tax breaks are now trying to act surprised that they’re raking in billions and billions of dollars in pure profit. This is another great example of Republican hypocrisy in action, and so is Senator Frists ‘bold plan’ for dealing with the problem of high gas prices: $100 tax rebate checks!

This is one of the least thought out ideas come out of a politicians press office in quite some time. To deal with the high price of gas, Senator Bill Frist wants to send all of us a $100 check in the mail that we could use to buy gasoline. Talk about an being an enabler! That’s like giving an addict money to buy more drugs because the price has gone up! On top of enabling the addiction and doing nothing to solve the problem, that $100 check is going to go right in the back pockets of the big oil companies that don’t seem to be having a problem making money right now.

Why a conservative Senator is suggesting that the Federal Government start subsidizing the oil industry, the most profitable in the world, boggles the mind and gives you an idea of how close the Senator and his pals must be with the industry.

Then there are the President’s plans, which following the script for administration policy in the last year are simply ineffectual and incompetent but polished up to look and sound like good ideas.

The problem with the people in charge of the government right now is they’re treating this like a flash in the pan issue and offering up flash in the pan solutions as a result. This issue of high gas prices is going to be with us through next Fall, and as a country we should start getting real about serious solutions to the problem, not simply applying band-aids to a hemorrhaging wound while whistling dixie.

4 Responses to “Gas Prices Get Political”

  1. Bruno Wolff IIIon 28 Apr 2006 at 2:39 pm

    The problem with high gas prices is more political than real. It is a very visible issue so politicians like to look like they are doing something to help their constituents. The amortized purchase price and maintenance (and insurance) together are comparable to the cost of gas.

    On a side note, if one wants to encourage people to use public transportation or purchase cars with better miles per gallon performance, letting gas prices go higher is a way to accomplish this.

    What probably does deserve some consideration is whether or not there was any illegal collusion involved with the increase in prices. Just having prices raise is not a strong indication of this, since in the short run, gasoline usage is fairly inelastic and there is significant lag time in adjusting production on the supply side. So it isn’t surprising that Katrina could have caused a large spike in retail prices.

  2. Last Laughon 28 Apr 2006 at 9:39 pm

    BOYCOTT MAY 5,6,& 7 DON’T BUY ANY GAS
    What better day to start the Boycott than Cinco de Mayo.
    Let’s send Big Brother and Big Oil both a message.

  3. Scotton 29 Apr 2006 at 12:10 pm

    Boycotting gas stations will sure do wonders. That’ll show big oil - we don’t need to travel on a weekend to see our families and friends. And that three days of lost revenue will sink them!

    For a boycott to be effective, it’s going to have to go more than a few days. And that will never happen. Imagine those hour-long commutes, except now you’re biking it… whew! You can possibly send a message doing this, but there’s not a great chance it’ll be heard or make any difference.

    I’m not sure what this will prove to Big Brother, though. Maybe that he won’t get to watch us buy gas for three days.

  4. JB Babyon 29 Apr 2006 at 2:57 pm

    I managed a boycott of my own last week. I sold my Triumph and bought a little Buell. Sure, nowhere near as sexy, but at 70+ MPG it’ll cut back my gas consumption more than half. Now, if the rest of the county could ditch the full-size SUV…

Comments RSS

Leave a Reply