<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Huge Victory for Milwaukee Transit, Parks, Quality of Life Overnight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dancody.org/archives/huge-victory-for-milwaukee-transit-parks-quality-of-life-overnight.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dancody.org/archives/huge-victory-for-milwaukee-transit-parks-quality-of-life-overnight.html</link>
	<description>Progressive commentary &#38; Wisconsin politics by Dan Cody of Milwaukee, Wisconsin.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 21:44:08 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mwarden</title>
		<link>http://dancody.org/archives/huge-victory-for-milwaukee-transit-parks-quality-of-life-overnight.html/comment-page-1#comment-58442</link>
		<dc:creator>mwarden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 22:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dancody.org/?p=2537#comment-58442</guid>
		<description>@the professor:

&gt; non-user funds from property taxes and other 
&gt; General Fund Appropriations made up $44.5 billion 
&gt; of the $116.5 billion in total revenues reported 
&gt; by the agency, with the remainder being covered by 
&gt; user fees.

Sir, this is exactly what I said. Roads are mostly funded by user fees. I know they are partially general-taxpayer subsidized, which is why I didn&#039;t say &quot;fully funded&quot;. The fact is, the majority of the funds come from the people who use the infrastructure. The only other form of transit I can think of where this is the case is airline travel, and even that is subsidized partially.

The point is that other forms of transit are more heavily funded by non-users, so Greg&#039;s injection of &quot;we pay for roads with taxes, so that&#039;s the same thing&quot; doesn&#039;t really apply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@the professor:</p>
<p>&gt; non-user funds from property taxes and other<br />
&gt; General Fund Appropriations made up $44.5 billion<br />
&gt; of the $116.5 billion in total revenues reported<br />
&gt; by the agency, with the remainder being covered by<br />
&gt; user fees.</p>
<p>Sir, this is exactly what I said. Roads are mostly funded by user fees. I know they are partially general-taxpayer subsidized, which is why I didn&#8217;t say &#8220;fully funded&#8221;. The fact is, the majority of the funds come from the people who use the infrastructure. The only other form of transit I can think of where this is the case is airline travel, and even that is subsidized partially.</p>
<p>The point is that other forms of transit are more heavily funded by non-users, so Greg&#8217;s injection of &#8220;we pay for roads with taxes, so that&#8217;s the same thing&#8221; doesn&#8217;t really apply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Professor Jerkwad</title>
		<link>http://dancody.org/archives/huge-victory-for-milwaukee-transit-parks-quality-of-life-overnight.html/comment-page-1#comment-58441</link>
		<dc:creator>Professor Jerkwad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 22:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dancody.org/?p=2537#comment-58441</guid>
		<description>@mwarden:

&lt;i&gt;Quote: Roads are funded mostly by fuel taxes and licensing fees. &lt;/i&gt;

False.  From the Finance section of the US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration&#039;s most recent (2006) report, non-user funds from property taxes and other General Fund Appropriations made up $44.5 billion of the $116.5 billion in total revenues reported by the agency, with the remainder being covered by user fees.  

(Source: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/ohpi/qffinance.cfm)

There are also many other costs to taxpayers not covered here such as the need for additional enforcement and emergency personnel, as well as infrastructure costs not covered by the Feds.  City parking ramps, for example, now cost roughly $50,000 PER STALL to build and maintain.  Clearly, these costs are not offset by user fees.  These costs all represent taxpayer subsidies of the auto-based transportation system.  

Any way you slice it, the car-based transportation system is taxpayer-subsidized.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@mwarden:</p>
<p><i>Quote: Roads are funded mostly by fuel taxes and licensing fees. </i></p>
<p>False.  From the Finance section of the US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration&#8217;s most recent (2006) report, non-user funds from property taxes and other General Fund Appropriations made up $44.5 billion of the $116.5 billion in total revenues reported by the agency, with the remainder being covered by user fees.  </p>
<p>(Source: <a href="http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/ohpi/qffinance.cfm)" rel="nofollow">http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/ohpi/qffinance.cfm)</a></p>
<p>There are also many other costs to taxpayers not covered here such as the need for additional enforcement and emergency personnel, as well as infrastructure costs not covered by the Feds.  City parking ramps, for example, now cost roughly $50,000 PER STALL to build and maintain.  Clearly, these costs are not offset by user fees.  These costs all represent taxpayer subsidies of the auto-based transportation system.  </p>
<p>Any way you slice it, the car-based transportation system is taxpayer-subsidized.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: quinner</title>
		<link>http://dancody.org/archives/huge-victory-for-milwaukee-transit-parks-quality-of-life-overnight.html/comment-page-1#comment-58434</link>
		<dc:creator>quinner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 20:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dancody.org/?p=2537#comment-58434</guid>
		<description>dan, et al.

thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dan, et al.</p>
<p>thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smitty</title>
		<link>http://dancody.org/archives/huge-victory-for-milwaukee-transit-parks-quality-of-life-overnight.html/comment-page-1#comment-58393</link>
		<dc:creator>Smitty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 20:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dancody.org/?p=2537#comment-58393</guid>
		<description>Greg,

&lt;i&gt;I like to pay taxes. With them I buy civilization.&lt;/i&gt;

O.K., taxes buys civilization. Accordingly, the more I am taxed the more I am civilized. If I turn all my property over to the state, I&#039;ll be totally civilized.

Yet every Holems quote has its antithesis:

&lt;i&gt;The power to tax is not the power to destroy while this Court sits.&lt;/i&gt; [Oliver Wendell Holmes]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg,</p>
<p><i>I like to pay taxes. With them I buy civilization.</i></p>
<p>O.K., taxes buys civilization. Accordingly, the more I am taxed the more I am civilized. If I turn all my property over to the state, I&#8217;ll be totally civilized.</p>
<p>Yet every Holems quote has its antithesis:</p>
<p><i>The power to tax is not the power to destroy while this Court sits.</i> [Oliver Wendell Holmes]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mwarden</title>
		<link>http://dancody.org/archives/huge-victory-for-milwaukee-transit-parks-quality-of-life-overnight.html/comment-page-1#comment-58387</link>
		<dc:creator>mwarden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 19:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dancody.org/?p=2537#comment-58387</guid>
		<description>@Greg,

Roads are funded mostly by fuel taxes and licensing fees. People who do not use roads do not buy fuel and do not pay for a drivers license.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Greg,</p>
<p>Roads are funded mostly by fuel taxes and licensing fees. People who do not use roads do not buy fuel and do not pay for a drivers license.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://dancody.org/archives/huge-victory-for-milwaukee-transit-parks-quality-of-life-overnight.html/comment-page-1#comment-58384</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 17:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dancody.org/?p=2537#comment-58384</guid>
		<description>Gee, maybe we shouldn&#039;t have taxes for roads, either. Waddya think?

&quot;I like to pay taxes.  With them I buy civilization.&quot;  ~Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee, maybe we shouldn&#8217;t have taxes for roads, either. Waddya think?</p>
<p>&#8220;I like to pay taxes.  With them I buy civilization.&#8221;  ~Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BonyT</title>
		<link>http://dancody.org/archives/huge-victory-for-milwaukee-transit-parks-quality-of-life-overnight.html/comment-page-1#comment-58378</link>
		<dc:creator>BonyT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 14:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dancody.org/?p=2537#comment-58378</guid>
		<description>JCG, where do you get your 21st figure from? You must have a different search engine than the rest of us. I can find no where that ranks us better than 9th with respect to state and local taxes and 9th in property taxes with relation to percentage of property value. 1st worse property tax with respect to income of homeowner. Do you consider MSM or CNN money cherry picking? You have failed to consider our onorous regulation and litigation policy though. If you are a business that is found 1% liable you can be made to pay %100 percent of the cost in Wisconsin. Doyle is leading the effort to punish businesses for emmiting carbon dioxide. Libs are trying increase the damages an employer are subject to for &quot;wrongfull firing&quot; to the highest in the country. If you think these are good poicies especially in these times and that these policies will be helpfull in attracting business than you are helpless. Funny how you libs try to say that the cost of doing business has nothing to do with growing business. Is this what your trying to sell us?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JCG, where do you get your 21st figure from? You must have a different search engine than the rest of us. I can find no where that ranks us better than 9th with respect to state and local taxes and 9th in property taxes with relation to percentage of property value. 1st worse property tax with respect to income of homeowner. Do you consider MSM or CNN money cherry picking? You have failed to consider our onorous regulation and litigation policy though. If you are a business that is found 1% liable you can be made to pay %100 percent of the cost in Wisconsin. Doyle is leading the effort to punish businesses for emmiting carbon dioxide. Libs are trying increase the damages an employer are subject to for &#8220;wrongfull firing&#8221; to the highest in the country. If you think these are good poicies especially in these times and that these policies will be helpfull in attracting business than you are helpless. Funny how you libs try to say that the cost of doing business has nothing to do with growing business. Is this what your trying to sell us?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruno Wolff</title>
		<link>http://dancody.org/archives/huge-victory-for-milwaukee-transit-parks-quality-of-life-overnight.html/comment-page-1#comment-58363</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruno Wolff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 05:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dancody.org/?p=2537#comment-58363</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t have a problem with a county wide sales tax being used for general funding. However I don&#039;t think a fixed (by percentage) sales tax used to finance a few specific things is a good idea because the funding level will likely not match the appropriate spending level. I rather see the county use a mix of property tax and sales tax for all of its functions and elect people who will allocate the money reasonably.
The property taxes are adjusted every year, which is faster than sales taxes can be in practice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have a problem with a county wide sales tax being used for general funding. However I don&#8217;t think a fixed (by percentage) sales tax used to finance a few specific things is a good idea because the funding level will likely not match the appropriate spending level. I rather see the county use a mix of property tax and sales tax for all of its functions and elect people who will allocate the money reasonably.<br />
The property taxes are adjusted every year, which is faster than sales taxes can be in practice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smitty</title>
		<link>http://dancody.org/archives/huge-victory-for-milwaukee-transit-parks-quality-of-life-overnight.html/comment-page-1#comment-58340</link>
		<dc:creator>Smitty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 16:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dancody.org/?p=2537#comment-58340</guid>
		<description>JCG,

I appreciate your sophmoric sarcasm. Perhaps I should follow your sage advice and move South like many other Wisconsin retirees, college graduates and manufacturing jobs.

As a retired person living on a pension and investments, I pay almost 25% of my income in federal, state, and city taxes---taxes that will only go up. That&#039;s not pixie dust, that&#039;s a hard reality.

You&#039;re the person living in a fool&#039;s pardise where a progressive government will solve all our problems if we were only willing to turn over more and more of our income and property. I&#039;m not willing but they&#039;ll take it anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JCG,</p>
<p>I appreciate your sophmoric sarcasm. Perhaps I should follow your sage advice and move South like many other Wisconsin retirees, college graduates and manufacturing jobs.</p>
<p>As a retired person living on a pension and investments, I pay almost 25% of my income in federal, state, and city taxes&#8212;taxes that will only go up. That&#8217;s not pixie dust, that&#8217;s a hard reality.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re the person living in a fool&#8217;s pardise where a progressive government will solve all our problems if we were only willing to turn over more and more of our income and property. I&#8217;m not willing but they&#8217;ll take it anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JCG</title>
		<link>http://dancody.org/archives/huge-victory-for-milwaukee-transit-parks-quality-of-life-overnight.html/comment-page-1#comment-58325</link>
		<dc:creator>JCG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 07:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dancody.org/?p=2537#comment-58325</guid>
		<description>Smitty, maybe you should move to Texas when it secedes.  Down there you&#039;ll be able to pay for your schools, libraries, roads, highways, fire stations, police, airports, military, court system, and yes even mass transit, with libertarian magic dust.  It&#039;ll be MAGICAL!!!!  Unicorns and everything!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smitty, maybe you should move to Texas when it secedes.  Down there you&#8217;ll be able to pay for your schools, libraries, roads, highways, fire stations, police, airports, military, court system, and yes even mass transit, with libertarian magic dust.  It&#8217;ll be MAGICAL!!!!  Unicorns and everything!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
