<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Journal Sentinel Columnist McIlheran: African American Comparison to Monkey Not Racist! Just &#8220;Provacative&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dancody.org/archives/journal-sentinel-columnist-mcilheran-african-american-comparison-to-monkey-not-racist-just-provacative.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dancody.org/archives/journal-sentinel-columnist-mcilheran-african-american-comparison-to-monkey-not-racist-just-provacative.html</link>
	<description>Progressive commentary &#38; Wisconsin politics by Dan Cody of Milwaukee, Wisconsin.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 02:54:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Buchs Cup</title>
		<link>http://dancody.org/archives/journal-sentinel-columnist-mcilheran-african-american-comparison-to-monkey-not-racist-just-provacative.html/comment-page-1#comment-26138</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Buchs Cup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 00:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dancody.org/?p=1419#comment-26138</guid>
		<description>Well, being &quot;insulting&quot; or &quot;offensive&quot; would certainly qualify as provocative. And to be frank, I have no problem with such activity. People can hurl insults or speak harshly all they want and I could care less - as long as it&#039;s not based in inherent or physical traits over which one has no control, like one&#039;s race or gender.

Which is why the monkey thing is completely different, and the links provided in McIlheran&#039;s article as examples of similar comparisons by Bush detractors ignore the incredible social significance of the context in play here. He acknowledges the usage of &quot;monkey&quot; as a racial slur, yet his links seem to be an effort to immediately side step said acknowledgment. I don&#039;t get what he&#039;s trying to accomplish by doing so, and he kinda undermines his own implied sincerity by doing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, being &#8220;insulting&#8221; or &#8220;offensive&#8221; would certainly qualify as provocative. And to be frank, I have no problem with such activity. People can hurl insults or speak harshly all they want and I could care less &#8211; as long as it&#8217;s not based in inherent or physical traits over which one has no control, like one&#8217;s race or gender.</p>
<p>Which is why the monkey thing is completely different, and the links provided in McIlheran&#8217;s article as examples of similar comparisons by Bush detractors ignore the incredible social significance of the context in play here. He acknowledges the usage of &#8220;monkey&#8221; as a racial slur, yet his links seem to be an effort to immediately side step said acknowledgment. I don&#8217;t get what he&#8217;s trying to accomplish by doing so, and he kinda undermines his own implied sincerity by doing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://dancody.org/archives/journal-sentinel-columnist-mcilheran-african-american-comparison-to-monkey-not-racist-just-provacative.html/comment-page-1#comment-26134</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 20:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dancody.org/?p=1419#comment-26134</guid>
		<description>I want to start off with a couple caveats; 1) I believe this shirt is inappropriate, stupid, and worst of all racist, 2) I really don&#039;t believe that McIlheran is defending racism or this shirt in particular.  

Saying that, I also believe that the J/S is an equal opportunity hirer of offensive and insulting writers.  So to point McIlheran&#039;s comments and not the likes of Eugene Kane is somewhat disingenuous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to start off with a couple caveats; 1) I believe this shirt is inappropriate, stupid, and worst of all racist, 2) I really don&#8217;t believe that McIlheran is defending racism or this shirt in particular.  </p>
<p>Saying that, I also believe that the J/S is an equal opportunity hirer of offensive and insulting writers.  So to point McIlheran&#8217;s comments and not the likes of Eugene Kane is somewhat disingenuous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milele</title>
		<link>http://dancody.org/archives/journal-sentinel-columnist-mcilheran-african-american-comparison-to-monkey-not-racist-just-provacative.html/comment-page-1#comment-26125</link>
		<dc:creator>Milele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 18:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dancody.org/?p=1419#comment-26125</guid>
		<description>Just when I don&#039;t think I can become any more offended by the Journal Sentinel allowing McIlheran to keep his job, he goes and spouts off nonsense like this again.

It&#039;s insulting and embarassing to Milwaukee that this person gets to use the State&#039;s largest paper as a platfom to proclaim his tolerance of racists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just when I don&#8217;t think I can become any more offended by the Journal Sentinel allowing McIlheran to keep his job, he goes and spouts off nonsense like this again.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s insulting and embarassing to Milwaukee that this person gets to use the State&#8217;s largest paper as a platfom to proclaim his tolerance of racists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
